Your cart is currently empty!
SayProApp Machines Services Jobs Courses Sponsor Donate Study Fundraise Training NPO Development Events Classified Forum Staff Shop Arts Biodiversity Sports Agri Tech Support Logistics Travel Government Classified Charity Corporate Investor School Accountants Career Health TV Client World Southern Africa Market Professionals Online Farm Academy Consulting Cooperative Group Holding Hosting MBA Network Construction Rehab Clinic Hospital Partner Community Security Research Pharmacy College University HighSchool PrimarySchool PreSchool Library STEM Laboratory Incubation NPOAfrica Crowdfunding Tourism Chemistry Investigations Cleaning Catering Knowledge Accommodation Geography Internships Camps BusinessSchool
SayPro Create Evaluation Tools
Email: info@saypro.online Call/WhatsApp: + 27 84 313 7407
SayPro is a Global Solutions Provider working with Individuals, Governments, Corporate Businesses, Municipalities, International Institutions. SayPro works across various Industries, Sectors providing wide range of solutions.
1. Checklist for Evaluating Sources
A checklist is a simple yet effective tool that helps researchers systematically assess various aspects of a source. Below is an example checklist:
Credibility Checklist:
- Is the author identified?
- Does the author have relevant qualifications or expertise?
- Is the publication reputable and well-known?
- Is the content free from spelling and grammatical errors?
- Is the information evidence-based and supported by references?
Relevance Checklist:
- Is the source related to your research topic or question?
- Does the content cover the necessary aspects of your topic?
- Is the information current and up-to-date?
- Does the source add value to your research?
- Is the context of the information appropriate for your needs?
Bias Checklist:
- Does the author present a balanced view?
- Are multiple perspectives included?
- Is the language objective and free from emotional manipulation?
- Is there any potential conflict of interest disclosed?
- Are advertisements or sponsored content clearly marked?
Authority Checklist:
- What are the author’s credentials and background?
- Is the author affiliated with a reputable institution or organization?
- Has the author published other works in the same field?
- Is the source peer-reviewed or published in a scholarly journal?
- Does the author provide contact information?
2. Rubric for Evaluating Sources
A rubric is a scoring tool that outlines specific criteria for evaluating sources and provides a scale for rating each criterion. Below is an example rubric:
| Criterion | Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Fair (2) | Poor (1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credibility | Author is highly qualified, source is reputable and error-free | Author is qualified, source is reputable with minor errors | Author’s qualifications are unclear, source is somewhat reputable | Author is not qualified, source is unreliable and error-prone |
| Relevance | Directly related to research topic, highly informative and current | Related to research topic, informative, and mostly current | Somewhat related to research topic, some useful information, moderately current | Not related to research topic, not informative, outdated |
| Bias | Completely objective, multiple perspectives, no conflict of interest | Mostly objective, some perspectives, minimal conflict of interest | Some bias, limited perspectives, potential conflict of interest | Highly biased, one-sided, conflict of interest present |
| Authority | Author has high credentials, affiliated with reputable institution, peer-reviewed | Author has relevant credentials, reputable affiliation, some peer-review | Author’s credentials are unclear, some reputable affiliation, limited peer-review | Author lacks credentials, no reputable affiliation, not peer-reviewed |
3. Template for Evaluating Sources
A template provides a structured format for researchers to record their evaluation of each source. Below is an example template:
Source Evaluation Template
- Source Details:
- Author(s):
- Title:
- Publication Date:
- Source Type (e.g., journal article, book, website):
- URL (if applicable):
- Credibility:
- Author Credentials:
- Publication Reputation:
- Evidence and References:
- Overall Credibility Rating (1-4):
- Relevance:
- Relation to Research Topic:
- Content Coverage:
- Currency of Information:
- Overall Relevance Rating (1-4):
- Bias:
- Objectivity:
- Perspectives Presented:
- Conflict of Interest:
- Overall Bias Rating (1-4):
- Authority:
- Author’s Credentials and Background:
- Affiliation with Reputable Institution:
- Peer-Review Status:
- Overall Authority Rating (1-4):
- Final Assessment:
- Strengths of the Source:
- Weaknesses of the Source:
- Overall Rating and Justification:
By providing participants with these checklists, rubrics, and templates, you equip them with practical tools to systematically evaluate sources and ensure the quality of their research.
- Neftaly Malatjie | CEO | SayPro
- Email: info@saypro.online
- Call: + 27 84 313 7407
- Website: www.saypro.online
SayPro – Shop– App – Jobs – Courses – Classified – Agri– School – Health – Events – Corporate – CharityNPO – Staff – Sports
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.